Skip to content

Rejected for "extraordinary circumstances": how to test the airline's reason

Quick answer

Extraordinary circumstances is the most common refusal and the most often misused. The Court of Justice has settled which causes qualify: technical problems, rostering, the airline's own strikes and knock-on delays from the airline's own operations do not; severe weather, ATC restrictions, bird strikes and third-party strikes can, if the airline proves they affected your flight and that it took all reasonable measures. Test the reason against those four questions before you accept it.

Why was your claim rejected?

Pick the reason the airline gave, then answer two or three questions. You get a routing state — not a legal decision — and the free review starts from your answers. Nothing you type here is stored.

Stays in your browser. Horvera reads it only to pre-select the reason; it is never sent anywhere.

The reason the airline gave

Does the airline's reason exempt it?

Enter the flight and paste the airline's explanation. Horvera tests it against the case law — which causes can be extraordinary, what the airline has to prove, and whether its reply proves it.

Check whether the airline's reason may exempt it

The four questions a reason has to pass

Article 5(3) excuses the airline only if the disruption was caused by extraordinary circumstances which could not have been avoided even if all reasonable measures had been taken. That is four tests, and the airline has to pass all of them:

  1. Is the cause on the list of things that can be extraordinary? Not inherent in the normal exercise of the airline’s activity and beyond its actual control (Wallentin-Hermann).
  2. Did it actually affect your flight? A storm elsewhere, or a strike that ended before your departure, is not a cause of your delay.
  3. Was it unavoidable? The airline must show it had no way round it — including re-routing you on another carrier.
  4. Did the airline take all reasonable measures? Spare aircraft, standby crew, rebooking — deploying the resources a reasonable airline keeps for disruption.

Reasons that do not hold up

  • Technical problems of any kind, including unexpected component failures — inherent in operating aircraft (Wallentin-Hermann, van der Lans). The exception is a hidden manufacturing defect or sabotage, which the airline must prove.
  • Crew shortages, rostering, crew timing out — the airline’s own operation (Krüsemann, TAP v flightright).
  • Strikes by the airline’s own staff — inherent in running an airline (Airhelp v SAS, Krüsemann).
  • Late inbound aircraft / knock-on delays — judged on the original cause; if that was operational, the knock-on is compensable.
  • “Operational reasons” with no detail — has not passed test 1.

Reasons that can hold up — with proof

  • Air-traffic-control restrictions — extraordinary in principle, but the airline must show the restriction applied to your flight at the relevant time and that other options were exhausted.
  • Severe weather — where it made the flight impossible or unsafe; a de-icing queue caused by too few de-icing rigs is operational.
  • Bird strike — extraordinary (Pešková), though the resulting delay must still have been unavoidable.
  • Third-party strikes — ATC, airport staff, ground handlers employed by someone else.
  • Security and safety events, closed runways, medical emergencies on board — depending on the facts.

How to test it in practice

Ask the airline, in writing, for the specific circumstance, the time it applied, and evidence — a NOTAM, an ATC slot message, a METAR weather report, a strike notice. Check whether other flights departed from the same airport in the same hour; publicly available flight-tracking history often shows they did. Ask what the airline did to avoid the delay and why you could not be re-routed. If the answers are missing or generic, say so in your escalation: the enforcement body and the ADR schemes apply exactly these tests, and the airline’s silence on them is the point. The cause-by-cause case law is on the extraordinary circumstances page; an “ATC” reason has its own checks on the air traffic control page.

What survives even when the reason holds

Extraordinary circumstances remove fixed compensation only. The right to a refund or re-routing (Article 8) and to meals, hotel and transport (Article 9) survive whatever the cause; the Court held in McDonagh that even the Icelandic ash cloud did not suspend care. If you paid for those yourself, that is a separate reimbursement claim.

The reasons airlines give, and what each one is worth

Airline says "extraordinary circumstances"

The airline is invoking Article 5(3): it says the cause was outside its control and unavoidable. That is a defence it has to prove for your flight, not a label it can apply to the day.

What to ask the airline, in writing
  • Which specific circumstance affected flight [number] on [date], at what time and at which airport?
  • Where is it recorded — a NOTAM, an ATC slot message, a METAR, a strike notice?
  • What measures did the airline take to avoid the delay, and why could you not be re-routed sooner?
  • Did other flights operate from the same airport in the same period?
When this reason holds
It holds when the airline names the event, shows it applied to your flight rather than the schedule in general, and shows that spare aircraft, standby crew or re-routing could not have avoided the delay. A refusal that names nothing has proven nothing.
Next step
Reply once asking the four questions with a 14-day deadline; if the answer stays generic, refer the case to the ADR scheme or the enforcement body — they apply exactly these tests.

Airline rejected your claim because of weather

Severe weather can be extraordinary — but only weather that actually made your flight impossible or unsafe, at the time it was due to operate. "Adverse weather conditions" with no place, time or report is a template.

What to ask the airline, in writing
  • What weather, at which airport and at what time, and what is the METAR or airport notice for that hour?
  • Did other flights depart from and arrive at that airport in the same period?
  • Was the delay caused by the weather itself or by a de-icing queue, a crew change or an aircraft swap the airline organised badly?
  • Why could the flight not be re-routed or retimed?
When this reason holds
It holds for a closed runway, a storm that halted operations, or visibility below the airport's minima for your slot. It does not hold for weather elsewhere, weather the day before, a knock-on delay the airline could have absorbed with a spare aircraft, or a de-icing queue the airline under-resourced.
Next step
Check publicly available flight history for the same airport and hour; if other flights operated, say so in your reply and escalate if the airline does not produce the weather record.

Airline rejected your claim because of a strike

Who was striking decides. A strike by the airline's own pilots, cabin crew or ground staff — even a lawful, union-organised one — is inherent in running an airline and is not extraordinary (Krüsemann, Airhelp v SAS). A strike by air-traffic controllers, airport security or a third-party handler can be.

What to ask the airline, in writing
  • Whose staff were on strike, employed by whom, and on which dates and hours?
  • Was your specific flight on the list of flights the strike cancelled or held, or was it cut to protect the rest of the schedule?
  • For a third-party strike: why could you not be re-routed, including on another airline?
When this reason holds
It holds for an ATC, airport or third-party handler strike that actually held your flight and left no re-routing option. It does not hold for the airline's own staff, for a strike that ended before your departure, or for "operational reasons" that turn out to be a rostering problem.
Next step
If the strike was the airline's own, reply citing Airhelp v SAS (C-28/20) and escalate after 14 days; if it was a third party, ask for the strike notice and the re-routing options that were considered.

Airline rejected compensation after a technical issue

Technical problems are inherent in operating aircraft and are not extraordinary — including unexpected component failures discovered on the day (Wallentin-Hermann, van der Lans). The only exceptions are a hidden manufacturing defect affecting the fleet, or sabotage or terrorism, which the airline must prove.

What to ask the airline, in writing
  • What exactly failed, and does the airline say it was a hidden manufacturing defect notified by the manufacturer or the regulator?
  • What did the airline do to avoid the delay — spare aircraft, another carrier, retiming?
When this reason holds
It almost never holds. A technical fault is the airline's risk; a refusal on this ground is the clearest case for a written reply and, if maintained, an ADR referral or a small claim.
Next step
Reply citing van der Lans (C-257/14) with a 14-day deadline; refer the case to the ADR scheme or the enforcement body if the airline maintains the refusal.

Sources

  1. Court of Justice of the European UnionCase C-28/20 Airhelp v Scandinavian Airlines — a strike organised by the airline's own staff is not an extraordinary circumstance
  2. Court of Justice of the European UnionJoined Cases C-195/17 etc. Krüsemann v TUIfly — a "wildcat strike" by airline staff is not an extraordinary circumstance
  3. Court of Justice of the European UnionCase C-12/11 McDonagh v Ryanair — the duty to provide care (meals, accommodation) applies without temporal or monetary limit, even in extraordinary circumstances
  4. Court of Justice of the European UnionCase C-315/15 Pešková and Peška v Travel Service — a collision with a bird is an extraordinary circumstance
  5. Court of Justice of the European UnionJoined Cases C-156/22 to C-158/22 TAP Portugal — unexpected absence of crew is not an extraordinary circumstance
  6. Court of Justice of the European UnionCase C-257/14 van der Lans v KLM — spontaneous technical failure is inherent in the normal exercise of the activity
  7. Court of Justice of the European UnionCase C-549/07 Wallentin-Hermann v Alitalia — technical problems are not, as such, extraordinary circumstances
  8. European CommissionInterpretative Guidelines on Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (2016/C 214/04)
  9. European Commission — DG MOVEHow to complain: contact the airline first, then the National Enforcement Body of the country of departure (or arrival for inbound EU-carrier flights)
  10. European Parliament and CouncilRegulation (EC) No 261/2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights

Last legally reviewed: 18 September 2026 · Content updated: 18 September 2026

Does the airline's reason exempt it?

Enter the flight and paste the airline's explanation. Horvera tests it against the case law — which causes can be extraordinary, what the airline has to prove, and whether its reply proves it.

Check whether the airline's reason may exempt it

Cookies and analytics

We use strictly necessary cookies to run the checker and your claim. With your consent we also use privacy-friendly analytics (PostHog, EU servers) to understand how the product is used. We never sell your data.