easyJet rejected your claim: what to do next
Esta página está disponible por ahora solo en inglés.
Check my flightAbout two minutes · no flight number needed
Respuesta rápida
A rejection from easyJet is a position, not a decision. The burden of proving an extraordinary circumstance is on easyJet, so ask for the specific cause of your flight's disruption; if the answer is vague or wrong in law, escalate to AviationADR and, if needed, the courts of the departure country within its limitation period.
Aerolínea operadora
easyJet U2 / EZY · United Kingdom
Aerolínea con licencia británica: el UK261 se aplica a sus vuelos desde el Reino Unido y a sus vuelos hacia el Reino Unido. El EU261 se aplica a sus vuelos desde la UE.
Regímenes aplicables: easyJet Europe, easyJet Switzerland
Dónde enviar tu reclamación
- Formulario oficial / centro de ayuda
- https://www.easyjet.com/en/help/delays-and-cancellations
- Atención al cliente
- https://www.easyjet.com/en/help
- Dirección postal
- easyJet Airline Company Limited, Customer Services, Hangar 89, London Luton Airport, Luton, Bedfordshire, LU2 9PF, United Kingdom
- Sistema de resolución de conflictos
- AviationADR
Escalation
After easyJet's final answer, or 8 weeks without one, escalate to AviationADR. A small claim in the departure country remains available within its limitation period.
Base pages: London (LGW), London (LTN), Geneva (GVA), Basel (BSL)
¿Pueden los pasajeros de easyJet reclamar una compensación?
Sí. easyJet tiene licencia británica, por lo que el Reglamento 261 cubre sus vuelos que salen de la UE/EEE, el Reino Unido o Suiza y los que llegan a ellos: 220 GBP–520 GBP por pasajero por un retraso en la llegada de 3 horas o más, una cancelación anunciada con menos de 14 días o una denegación de embarque, salvo que la aerolínea pruebe una circunstancia extraordinaria.
¿Se aplica a su vuelo?
¿Afectado por un vuelo de easyJet?
Unas pocas preguntas breves; todavía no hace falta el número de vuelo. Obtiene un resultado preliminar sobre los hechos que indique; la comprobación completa lo confirma a partir del itinerario.
Ya conocido por esta página
- easyJet
¿Qué pasó con su vuelo?
When easyJet says no
easyJet’s rejection e-mails are short and usually cite one of three grounds: “air traffic control restrictions”, “adverse weather” or “operational reasons”. The first two can be extraordinary but only if they affected your flight — ask easyJet for the time of the restriction, the airport it applied to and whether other easyJet departures operated. “Operational reasons” is not a cause at all; reply that the burden of proof is on the carrier and ask for the actual reason.
The escalation route depends on which easyJet operated the flight, which is printed on your boarding pass. easyJet UK is a member of AviationADR, an approved ADR scheme whose decisions bind the airline; you can go to AviationADR after easyJet’s final answer or eight weeks of silence. easyJet Europe (Austrian licence) belongs to the Austrian apf scheme, and easyJet Switzerland’s flights fall under the Swiss Federal Office of Civil Aviation. For a flight that departed from an EU airport you may also complain to that country’s enforcement body whichever easyJet flew it.
Court is the last step: a small claim in England and Wales for UK departures, or the departure country’s small-claims procedure. easyJet regularly settles once a claim is issued with the correct legal basis, so cite the arrival delay, the distance band and the case law on the cause it named.
Read the rejection against the law
easyJet can lawfully refuse the £220, £350 or £520 compensation in only a few situations: the arrival delay was under 3 hours; the cancellation was announced 14 days or more ahead; a replacement flight met the legal time windows; the flight was outside the scope of UK261; or an extraordinary circumstance caused the disruption and reasonable measures could not have avoided it. Anything else — “operational reasons”, “we are not responsible”, a reference to easyJet’s own conditions — is not a defence.
Ask for the cause, in writing
Under Article 5(3) the burden of proof lies with easyJet. Reply to the rejection asking: what exactly caused this flight’s disruption; at what time and airport any restriction applied; whether other easyJet flights operated; and, for a knock-on delay, what caused the first delay in the rotation. An answer that cannot name a specific cause is an answer that fails the burden of proof.
Escalate to AviationADR
After easyJet’s final answer, or 8 weeks without one, escalate to AviationADR. An approved ADR scheme issues decisions that bind the airline; a national enforcement body investigates and can fine the airline, though it does not always award your money. Either is free to you and needs only the claim, the rejection and your reply.
The court route and the deadline
A small claim in the country of departure (or of easyJet’s seat) is the final step and often the one that produces payment. The limitation period depends on that country — from one to six years — so a rejection should never be left to run the clock. Horvera’s country pages list the period for each departure country.
What to send when you go back to easyJet
- the booking reference, flight number and date;
- the scheduled and actual arrival times, or the cancellation notice with its timestamp;
- the distance band and the amount claimed per passenger (£220, £350 or £520);
- the case law on the cause easyJet named (technical: Wallentin-Hermann, van der Lans; own strike: Krüsemann, Airhelp v SAS; crew: TAP C-156/22);
- a deadline of 14 days before escalation.
Los motivos que dan las aerolíneas, y lo que vale cada uno
Airline says "extraordinary circumstances"
The airline is invoking Article 5(3): it says the cause was outside its control and unavoidable. That is a defence it has to prove for your flight, not a label it can apply to the day.
- Qué pedir a la aerolínea, por escrito
- Which specific circumstance affected flight [number] on [date], at what time and at which airport?
- Where is it recorded — a NOTAM, an ATC slot message, a METAR, a strike notice?
- What measures did the airline take to avoid the delay, and why could you not be re-routed sooner?
- Did other flights operate from the same airport in the same period?
- Cuándo este motivo se sostiene
- It holds when the airline names the event, shows it applied to your flight rather than the schedule in general, and shows that spare aircraft, standby crew or re-routing could not have avoided the delay. A refusal that names nothing has proven nothing.
- Siguiente paso
- Reply once asking the four questions with a 14-day deadline; if the answer stays generic, refer the case to the ADR scheme or the enforcement body — they apply exactly these tests.
Airline rejected compensation after a technical issue
Technical problems are inherent in operating aircraft and are not extraordinary — including unexpected component failures discovered on the day (Wallentin-Hermann, van der Lans). The only exceptions are a hidden manufacturing defect affecting the fleet, or sabotage or terrorism, which the airline must prove.
- Qué pedir a la aerolínea, por escrito
- What exactly failed, and does the airline say it was a hidden manufacturing defect notified by the manufacturer or the regulator?
- What did the airline do to avoid the delay — spare aircraft, another carrier, retiming?
- Cuándo este motivo se sostiene
- It almost never holds. A technical fault is the airline's risk; a refusal on this ground is the clearest case for a written reply and, if maintained, an ADR referral or a small claim.
- Siguiente paso
- Reply citing van der Lans (C-257/14) with a 14-day deadline; refer the case to the ADR scheme or the enforcement body if the airline maintains the refusal.
Airline says the delay was under three hours
A dispute about the arrival time. The moment that counts is when at least one aircraft door opened at your final destination (Germanwings v Henning), compared with the scheduled arrival on the booking — not touchdown, not the departure delay, not the time on the screen.
- Qué pedir a la aerolínea, por escrito
- What time does the airline say the doors opened at [final destination], and what is that based on?
- What was the scheduled arrival time on the booking as originally issued?
- For a connection on one booking: was the delay measured at the final destination rather than at the hub?
- Cuándo este motivo se sostiene
- It holds when the doors genuinely opened less than three hours after the scheduled arrival: a 2 h 55 arrival delay carries no fixed compensation, although care and expenses may still be due. It does not hold when the airline measured touchdown, the departure, or the wrong leg.
- Siguiente paso
- Compare the airline's figure with your own evidence — a photo of the arrivals board, a timestamped message, flight-tracking history. If your figure is three hours or more, reply with it and escalate; if it is under three hours, claim the care and expenses you paid for instead.
Airline says it was not responsible
Usually one of three things: "we did not operate the flight" (a partner or wet-lease airline did), "the delay came from an earlier flight" (a knock-on), or "the airport / handler / ATC caused it". Only the operating carrier owes compensation — but the operating carrier cannot pass a knock-on delay or its own contractor's failure to someone else.
- Qué pedir a la aerolínea, por escrito
- Which airline operated the aircraft, as shown on the boarding pass?
- For a knock-on delay: what caused the first delay in the rotation, and was that cause extraordinary?
- For a contractor (ground handler, de-icing company): was it working for the airline?
- Cuándo este motivo se sostiene
- It holds when another airline genuinely operated the flight — claim from that airline instead. It does not hold for a late inbound aircraft whose original delay was operational, or for a handler the airline itself engaged.
- Siguiente paso
- Confirm the operating carrier from the boarding pass; re-address the claim if it was the wrong airline, otherwise reply asking for the root cause of the first delay and escalate.
Airline has not answered your claim
Silence is common and it is not a refusal. It does not stop the limitation period running, and most ADR schemes accept a case after eight weeks without a substantive reply; the enforcement body accepts a complaint at any time.
- Qué pedir a la aerolínea, por escrito
- Did the claim reach the airline — is there an acknowledgement or a case reference?
- Has the airline's own published response time passed?
- Cuándo este motivo se sostiene
- Silence never defeats a claim; only the limitation period of the departure country does. Check that period before waiting on the airline.
- Siguiente paso
- After four weeks send a dated reminder with a 14-day deadline; after eight weeks refer the claim to the ADR scheme or the enforcement body of the departure country.
Preguntas frecuentes
easyJet says the cause was extraordinary — do I have to accept that?
No. easyJet has to prove it for your flight. Ask for the specific cause and the measures it took; if the answer is generic, escalate to AviationADR.
How long can I wait after easyJet's rejection?
Escalate as soon as you have the final answer. The court deadline is the limitation period of the departure country — between one and six years — and it keeps running while you wait.
easyJet rejected my claim citing ATC restrictions — what now?
Ask for the specific restriction: which airport, what time window and whether it applied to your flight rather than the day in general. If easyJet cannot show that, or the delay was really a knock-on from an earlier rotation, escalate to AviationADR (easyJet UK) or apf (easyJet Europe).
Is AviationADR free for an easyJet claim?
AviationADR is free for passengers; check its current scheme rules for any fee on a claim it rejects before filing. Its decision binds easyJet but not you — you keep the right to go to court.
How long does easyJet have to answer before I can escalate?
The UK CAA expects a final response within eight weeks. After that, or after a rejection you disagree with, you can file with AviationADR for easyJet UK flights (it accepts easyJet flights with a UK or Swiss airport) or with the enforcement body of the departure country.
Fuentes
- European Community / Swiss ConfederationAgreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport (signed 21 June 1999)
- Court of Justice of the European UnionJoined Cases C-402/07 and C-432/07 Sturgeon v Condor and Böck v Air France — passengers of flights delayed by three hours or more may claim compensation
- Court of Justice of the European UnionCase C-549/07 Wallentin-Hermann v Alitalia — technical problems are not, as such, extraordinary circumstances
- European CommissionInterpretative Guidelines on Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (2016/C 214/04)
- European Parliament and CouncilRegulation (EC) No 261/2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights
- UK Civil Aviation AuthorityAlternative dispute resolution (ADR) for aviation complaints
- UK Civil Aviation AuthorityDelays and cancellations — your rights
- UK Government — legislation.gov.ukRegulation (EC) No 261/2004 as retained in UK law (assimilated law)
- UK Government — legislation.gov.ukThe Air Passenger Rights and Air Travel Organisers' Licensing (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (SI 2019/278)
Última revisión legal: 12 de septiembre de 2026 · Contenido actualizado: 12 de septiembre de 2026
Deje que Horvera revise por qué rechazaron su reclamación.
Indique el vuelo y el motivo que dio la aerolínea. La comprobación gratuita le dice si correspondía compensación, el importe y la vía de reclamación de su país de salida.