EU261 claim letter template: the wording, the articles to cite and how to fill it in
Cette page est pour l’instant disponible en anglais uniquement.
Réponse rapide
An EU261 claim letter cites Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Article 7 for the amount, Article 5 for cancellations, Article 4 for denied boarding, Article 6 with the Sturgeon and Nelson judgments for delays — states the arrival delay or notice period, the distance band (€250, €400 or €600 per passenger), refuses vouchers under Article 7(3) and gives the airline a deadline before the national enforcement body is involved. The template below covers all three disruptions; delete the paragraphs that do not apply.
Réponse directe
- En bref
- Cite Regulation (EC) No 261/2004: Article 7 for the amount, Article 5 (cancellation), Article 4 (denied boarding) or Article 6 with Sturgeon and Nelson (delay), state the distance band and refuse vouchers under Article 7(3).
- Montant
- €250 – €600per passenger, by distance band
- Pourquoi
- The Regulation applies to every flight departing the EU/EEA and to arrivals on EU/EEA airlines; naming the article and the band leaves the airline only the extraordinary-circumstances defence, which it must prove.
- Ce qui peut changer la réponse
- The flight departed from the UK: use the UK261 template (retained regulation, £ amounts, ADR schemes).
- The airline proves an extraordinary circumstance it could not have avoided.
- The cancellation was announced 14 days or more before departure.
- An intra-EU flight over 3,500 km is capped at €400.
- Vérifiez votre vol
- Vérifier si EU261 s’applique
- Source officielle
- Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights — European Parliament and CouncilDernière vérification à la source le 23 septembre 2026
Modèle à compléter
[Your full name] [Your postal address] [Your e-mail address] [Airline name] Customer Relations [Airline postal address] [Date] Subject: Claim under Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — flight [flight number] on [date] — booking [booking reference] Dear Sir or Madam, I am writing to claim compensation under Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 for flight [flight number] from [departure airport] to [arrival airport] on [date], operated by [airline], on which I travelled [with (names of other passengers)] under booking reference [booking reference]. [DELAY] The flight arrived at my final destination [X hours Y minutes] after the scheduled arrival time. Under Articles 5, 6 and 7 of the Regulation as interpreted by the Court of Justice in Sturgeon (C-402/07) and Nelson (C-581/10), an arrival delay of three hours or more gives rise to the same fixed compensation as a cancellation. [CANCELLATION] The flight was cancelled and I was informed [when — e.g. "two days before departure"]. [No alternative flight was offered. / The alternative offered departed [X] hours before and arrived [Y] hours after the original schedule, outside the limits of Article 5(1)(c).] Compensation under Article 7 is therefore due. [DENIED BOARDING] I held a confirmed reservation and presented myself for check-in on time, but I was denied boarding against my will [because the flight was overbooked]. Under Article 4(3), compensation under Article 7 is due immediately, without any extraordinary-circumstances defence. [Reason paragraph — delete what does not apply] [No reason was given for the disruption. / You attributed the disruption to [reason].] Under Article 5(3), as interpreted in Wallentin-Hermann (C-549/07), the burden of proving that an extraordinary circumstance caused the disruption and that all reasonable measures were taken rests entirely on the operating carrier. [Technical faults, crew problems and strikes by your own staff are not extraordinary circumstances (Wallentin-Hermann, C-549/07; van der Lans, C-257/14; Krüsemann, C-195/17; Airhelp v SAS, C-28/20).] The distance from [departure airport] to [final destination] is [X km], which places the flight in the [first / second / third] band of Article 7(1). The compensation due is therefore [€250 / €400 / €600] per passenger, [€ total] in total for the [N] passengers on the booking. Please pay the compensation by bank transfer within 14 days of the date of this letter. I do not accept a voucher in place of payment (Article 7(3)). [I also claim reimbursement of the reasonable expenses I incurred because the care required by Article 9 was not provided: [itemised amounts]; receipts are attached.] If I do not receive a substantive reply within six weeks, I will refer the matter to the national enforcement body under Article 16 and, if necessary, to the courts, without further notice. Yours faithfully, [Your full name] Attachments: booking confirmation, boarding pass, [evidence of the actual arrival time / cancellation notice / statement received at the gate], [receipts].
Les crochets indiquent ce que vous complétez. Supprimez les paragraphes qui ne concernent pas votre vol.
| Distance | UE / CH (règl. 261/2004) |
|---|---|
| Jusqu'à 1 500 km | 250 € |
| 1 500 – 3 500 km | 400 € |
| Plus de 3 500 km, deux aéroports UE/EEE | 400 € |
| Plus de 3 500 km | 600 € |
Vérifiez votre vol gratuitement
Indiquez votre vol et obtenez une vérification de vos droits en 60 secondes environ.
When this template is the right one
Use it when the flight departed from an airport in the EU, Norway, Iceland or Liechtenstein (any airline), or arrived at one on an EU/EEA-licensed airline, or departed from Switzerland. If the flight departed from the UK, use the UK261 template instead: the amounts, the escalation route and the time limit differ. Not sure which applies? The checker decides it from the route and the airline in a minute.
How to fill it in
- Flight number, date, route — from the booking confirmation. Name the operating airline (on the boarding pass), not the ticket seller.
- Delay — hours and minutes between the scheduled arrival and the moment the doors opened at the final destination. Departure delay is irrelevant.
- Cancellation — when you were told (the e-mail timestamp), and the times of the alternative offered. If you were told 14 days or more ahead, delete the compensation claim and keep the refund or re-routing claim.
- Denied boarding — keep the paragraph only if you were refused against your will.
- Reason — quote the airline’s words. Technical faults, crew problems and strikes by the airline’s own staff are not extraordinary (Wallentin-Hermann, van der Lans, Krüsemann, Airhelp v SAS); weather, ATC and airport strikes may be, and then the letter asks the airline to prove them.
- Distance and band — the great-circle distance from the first departure to the final destination: up to 1,500 km → €250; 1,500–3,500 km, and every intra-EU flight over 1,500 km → €400; over 3,500 km → €600. The compensation calculator guide explains it; the generator computes it.
- Expenses — only if you paid for meals, hotel or transport the airline should have provided; attach receipts.
What the citations mean
- Article 7(1) — the three amounts by distance. Article 7(2) — the 50 % reduction when re-routing arrives within 2/3/4 hours. Article 7(3) — payment in money unless you sign for a voucher.
- Article 5(1)© — a cancellation announced less than 14 days ahead carries compensation unless the alternative met the time windows. Article 5(3) — the extraordinary-circumstances exemption, for the airline to prove.
- Article 4(3) — denied boarding: compensation immediately, no exemption.
- Sturgeon (C-402/07) and Nelson (C-581/10) — a delay of 3 hours or more at arrival is compensated like a cancellation.
- Wallentin-Hermann (C-549/07) — the two-part test for extraordinary circumstances and the burden of proof.
- Article 16 — the national enforcement body of the departure country handles complaints when the airline does not.
Where to send it, and what comes next
Submit through the airline’s compensation form where one exists (Horvera’s airline pages list them), and keep the case reference. If the airline refuses or does not answer within six weeks, complain to the enforcement body of the country of departure — the European Commission keeps the list of national enforcement bodies — or to the airline’s ADR scheme. The courts remain open within the national limitation period: time limits by country.
The general guide — what a claim must contain, how airlines reply, what happens after — is on the claim letter page.
Questions fréquentes
Which language should an EU261 claim letter be in?
Any language the airline works in; English is accepted by every major European airline. Enforcement bodies accept complaints in their own language and usually in English.
Should I quote the case law, or is the article enough?
The article is enough for a cancellation or denied boarding. For a delay, add Sturgeon and Nelson: the Regulation's text does not mention delay compensation, and the case law is what makes it due.
The airline is not European — can I still use this template?
Yes, if the flight departed from an EU/EEA airport: the Regulation binds every operating airline on such flights. For a flight into Europe on a non-European airline it does not apply, and the letter would have no legal basis.
Do I send one letter per passenger?
One letter per booking, naming every passenger and multiplying the amount. If passengers were on different bookings, send one letter per booking reference.
Sources
- Court of Justice of the European UnionCase C-28/20 Airhelp v Scandinavian Airlines — a strike organised by the airline's own staff is not an extraordinary circumstance
- Court of Justice of the European UnionJoined Cases C-195/17 etc. Krüsemann v TUIfly — a "wildcat strike" by airline staff is not an extraordinary circumstance
- Court of Justice of the European UnionJoined Cases C-581/10 and C-629/10 Nelson v Lufthansa and TUI Travy v CAA — confirmation of Sturgeon
- Court of Justice of the European UnionJoined Cases C-402/07 and C-432/07 Sturgeon v Condor and Böck v Air France — passengers of flights delayed by three hours or more may claim compensation
- Court of Justice of the European UnionCase C-257/14 van der Lans v KLM — spontaneous technical failure is inherent in the normal exercise of the activity
- Court of Justice of the European UnionCase C-549/07 Wallentin-Hermann v Alitalia — technical problems are not, as such, extraordinary circumstances
- European CommissionInterpretative Guidelines on Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (2016/C 214/04)
- European Commission — DG MOVEHow to complain: contact the airline first, then the National Enforcement Body of the country of departure (or arrival for inbound EU-carrier flights)
- European Parliament and CouncilRegulation (EC) No 261/2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights
Dernière revue juridique : 17 septembre 2026 · Contenu mis à jour : 17 septembre 2026
Vérifiez votre vol gratuitement
Indiquez votre vol et obtenez une vérification de vos droits en 60 secondes environ.