Aller au contenu

Ryanair rejected your claim: what to do next

Cette page est pour l’instant disponible en anglais uniquement.

Check my flightAbout two minutes · no flight number needed

Réponse rapide

A rejection from Ryanair is a position, not a decision. The burden of proving an extraordinary circumstance is on Ryanair, so ask for the specific cause of your flight's disruption; if the answer is vague or wrong in law, escalate to AviationADR (UK flights) and, if needed, the courts of the departure country within its limitation period.

Transporteur effectif

Ryanair FR / RYR · Ireland

Compagnie titulaire d'une licence UE/EEE — le règlement 261/2004 s'applique à tous ses vols au départ de l'UE/EEE et à ses vols vers l'UE/EEE.

Régimes applicables: Ryanair UK, Malta Air, Buzz, Lauda Europe

Où envoyer votre réclamation

Formulaire officiel / centre d'aide
https://help.ryanair.com/hc/en-gb
Adresse postale
Ryanair DAC, Customer Service Department, PO Box 11451, Swords, Co. Dublin, Ireland
Dispositif de médiation
AviationADR (UK flights)

Recours

Après la réponse définitive de Ryanair, ou 8 semaines sans réponse, saisissez AviationADR (UK flights). Une procédure simplifiée devant le tribunal du pays de départ reste possible dans le délai de prescription.

Pages par base: London (STN), Dublin (DUB), Milan (BGY)

Les passagers Ryanair peuvent-ils réclamer une indemnisation ?

Oui. Ryanair détient une licence UE/EEE ; le règlement 261 couvre donc ses vols au départ de l'UE/EEE, du Royaume-Uni ou de la Suisse et ses vols à destination de ces territoires : 250 €–600 € par passager pour un retard à l'arrivée de 3 heures ou plus, une annulation annoncée moins de 14 jours avant ou un refus d'embarquement — sauf si la compagnie prouve une circonstance extraordinaire.

Cela s'applique-t-il à votre vol ?

Un vol Ryanair concerné ?

Quelques questions courtes — pas encore besoin du numéro de vol. Vous obtenez un résultat préliminaire sur les faits indiqués ; la vérification complète le confirme à partir de l'itinéraire.

Déjà connu grâce à cette page

  • Ryanair

Qu'est-il arrivé à votre vol ?

Ryanair’s standard rejection and how to answer it

Ryanair answers most EU261 claims with a template that names “extraordinary circumstances” — typically ATC staffing, an ATC strike or weather — and closes the case. Ryanair also refuses to deal with third-party claim companies without a power of attorney, which is why claiming yourself is the fastest route. Reply to the rejection with the questions that matter: the exact cause of your flight’s delay, the time and location of any ATC restriction, and the cause of the first delay if yours was a knock-on from an earlier rotation. Ryanair rarely provides that evidence, and without it the defence fails.

Escalation follows the departure airport. Flights from the UK: AviationADR, an approved scheme Ryanair is a member of and whose decisions bind it. Flights from Ireland: the Irish Aviation Authority, the enforcement body. Flights from other EU countries: that country’s enforcement body — the LBA in Germany, AESA in Spain (whose decisions bind the airline), ENAC in Italy, the DGAC in France. A complaint to a body is free; give it the claim, Ryanair’s answer and your reply.

Court is the final step and the one Ryanair responds to: a small claim in the departure country, or in Ireland under Ryanair’s Irish contract. Ireland’s six-year limitation period is generous; other countries are shorter, so do not let a rejection run the clock.

Read the rejection against the law

Ryanair can lawfully refuse the €250, €400 or €600 compensation in only a few situations: the arrival delay was under 3 hours; the cancellation was announced 14 days or more ahead; a replacement flight met the legal time windows; the flight was outside the scope of EU261; or an extraordinary circumstance caused the disruption and reasonable measures could not have avoided it. Anything else — “operational reasons”, “we are not responsible”, a reference to Ryanair’s own conditions — is not a defence.

Ask for the cause, in writing

Under Article 5(3) the burden of proof lies with Ryanair. Reply to the rejection asking: what exactly caused this flight’s disruption; at what time and airport any restriction applied; whether other Ryanair flights operated; and, for a knock-on delay, what caused the first delay in the rotation. An answer that cannot name a specific cause is an answer that fails the burden of proof.

Escalate to AviationADR (UK flights)

After Ryanair’s final answer, or 8 weeks without one, escalate to AviationADR (UK flights). An approved ADR scheme issues decisions that bind the airline; a national enforcement body investigates and can fine the airline, though it does not always award your money. Either is free to you and needs only the claim, the rejection and your reply.

The court route and the deadline

A small claim in the country of departure (or of Ryanair’s seat) is the final step and often the one that produces payment. The limitation period depends on that country — from one to six years — so a rejection should never be left to run the clock. Horvera’s country pages list the period for each departure country.

What to send when you go back to Ryanair

  • the booking reference, flight number and date;
  • the scheduled and actual arrival times, or the cancellation notice with its timestamp;
  • the distance band and the amount claimed per passenger (€250, €400 or €600);
  • the case law on the cause Ryanair named (technical: Wallentin-Hermann, van der Lans; own strike: Krüsemann, Airhelp v SAS; crew: TAP C-156/22);
  • a deadline of 14 days before escalation.

Les motifs invoqués par les compagnies, et ce que chacun vaut

Airline says "extraordinary circumstances"

The airline is invoking Article 5(3): it says the cause was outside its control and unavoidable. That is a defence it has to prove for your flight, not a label it can apply to the day.

Ce qu’il faut demander à la compagnie, par écrit
  • Which specific circumstance affected flight [number] on [date], at what time and at which airport?
  • Where is it recorded — a NOTAM, an ATC slot message, a METAR, a strike notice?
  • What measures did the airline take to avoid the delay, and why could you not be re-routed sooner?
  • Did other flights operate from the same airport in the same period?
Quand ce motif tient
It holds when the airline names the event, shows it applied to your flight rather than the schedule in general, and shows that spare aircraft, standby crew or re-routing could not have avoided the delay. A refusal that names nothing has proven nothing.
Prochaine étape
Reply once asking the four questions with a 14-day deadline; if the answer stays generic, refer the case to the ADR scheme or the enforcement body — they apply exactly these tests.

Airline rejected compensation after a technical issue

Technical problems are inherent in operating aircraft and are not extraordinary — including unexpected component failures discovered on the day (Wallentin-Hermann, van der Lans). The only exceptions are a hidden manufacturing defect affecting the fleet, or sabotage or terrorism, which the airline must prove.

Ce qu’il faut demander à la compagnie, par écrit
  • What exactly failed, and does the airline say it was a hidden manufacturing defect notified by the manufacturer or the regulator?
  • What did the airline do to avoid the delay — spare aircraft, another carrier, retiming?
Quand ce motif tient
It almost never holds. A technical fault is the airline's risk; a refusal on this ground is the clearest case for a written reply and, if maintained, an ADR referral or a small claim.
Prochaine étape
Reply citing van der Lans (C-257/14) with a 14-day deadline; refer the case to the ADR scheme or the enforcement body if the airline maintains the refusal.

Airline says the delay was under three hours

A dispute about the arrival time. The moment that counts is when at least one aircraft door opened at your final destination (Germanwings v Henning), compared with the scheduled arrival on the booking — not touchdown, not the departure delay, not the time on the screen.

Ce qu’il faut demander à la compagnie, par écrit
  • What time does the airline say the doors opened at [final destination], and what is that based on?
  • What was the scheduled arrival time on the booking as originally issued?
  • For a connection on one booking: was the delay measured at the final destination rather than at the hub?
Quand ce motif tient
It holds when the doors genuinely opened less than three hours after the scheduled arrival: a 2 h 55 arrival delay carries no fixed compensation, although care and expenses may still be due. It does not hold when the airline measured touchdown, the departure, or the wrong leg.
Prochaine étape
Compare the airline's figure with your own evidence — a photo of the arrivals board, a timestamped message, flight-tracking history. If your figure is three hours or more, reply with it and escalate; if it is under three hours, claim the care and expenses you paid for instead.

Airline says it was not responsible

Usually one of three things: "we did not operate the flight" (a partner or wet-lease airline did), "the delay came from an earlier flight" (a knock-on), or "the airport / handler / ATC caused it". Only the operating carrier owes compensation — but the operating carrier cannot pass a knock-on delay or its own contractor's failure to someone else.

Ce qu’il faut demander à la compagnie, par écrit
  • Which airline operated the aircraft, as shown on the boarding pass?
  • For a knock-on delay: what caused the first delay in the rotation, and was that cause extraordinary?
  • For a contractor (ground handler, de-icing company): was it working for the airline?
Quand ce motif tient
It holds when another airline genuinely operated the flight — claim from that airline instead. It does not hold for a late inbound aircraft whose original delay was operational, or for a handler the airline itself engaged.
Prochaine étape
Confirm the operating carrier from the boarding pass; re-address the claim if it was the wrong airline, otherwise reply asking for the root cause of the first delay and escalate.

Airline has not answered your claim

Silence is common and it is not a refusal. It does not stop the limitation period running, and most ADR schemes accept a case after eight weeks without a substantive reply; the enforcement body accepts a complaint at any time.

Ce qu’il faut demander à la compagnie, par écrit
  • Did the claim reach the airline — is there an acknowledgement or a case reference?
  • Has the airline's own published response time passed?
Quand ce motif tient
Silence never defeats a claim; only the limitation period of the departure country does. Check that period before waiting on the airline.
Prochaine étape
After four weeks send a dated reminder with a 14-day deadline; after eight weeks refer the claim to the ADR scheme or the enforcement body of the departure country.

Questions fréquentes

Ryanair says the cause was extraordinary — do I have to accept that?

No. Ryanair has to prove it for your flight. Ask for the specific cause and the measures it took; if the answer is generic, escalate to AviationADR (UK flights).

How long can I wait after Ryanair's rejection?

Escalate as soon as you have the final answer. The court deadline is the limitation period of the departure country — between one and six years — and it keeps running while you wait.

Ryanair rejected my claim for "ATC restrictions" — is that final?

No. Ask for the specific restriction and its time window. If Ryanair cannot show it applied to your flight, escalate to AviationADR (UK departures) or the enforcement body of the departure country.

Can I use a claim company against Ryanair?

You can, but Ryanair requires a power of attorney and its own verification, which slows things down. Claiming directly is faster and you keep the full amount.

Which body handles a Ryanair complaint for a flight from Spain?

AESA, Spain's enforcement body, whose decisions are binding on the airline for claims within its procedure. Use its online complaint form after Ryanair's rejection.

Sources

  1. Court of Justice of the European UnionJoined Cases C-402/07 and C-432/07 Sturgeon v Condor and Böck v Air France — passengers of flights delayed by three hours or more may claim compensation
  2. Court of Justice of the European UnionCase C-257/14 van der Lans v KLM — spontaneous technical failure is inherent in the normal exercise of the activity
  3. Court of Justice of the European UnionCase C-549/07 Wallentin-Hermann v Alitalia — technical problems are not, as such, extraordinary circumstances
  4. European CommissionInterpretative Guidelines on Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (2016/C 214/04)
  5. European Parliament and CouncilRegulation (EC) No 261/2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights
  6. UK Civil Aviation AuthorityAlternative dispute resolution (ADR) for aviation complaints
  7. UK Civil Aviation AuthorityDelays and cancellations — your rights
  8. UK Government — legislation.gov.ukRegulation (EC) No 261/2004 as retained in UK law (assimilated law)
  9. UK Government — legislation.gov.ukThe Air Passenger Rights and Air Travel Organisers' Licensing (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (SI 2019/278)

Dernière revue juridique : 12 septembre 2026 · Contenu mis à jour : 12 septembre 2026

Laissez Horvera examiner pourquoi votre réclamation a été rejetée.

Indiquez le vol et le motif donné par la compagnie. La vérification gratuite vous dit si une indemnisation était due, son montant et la voie de recours applicable à votre pays de départ.

Examiner ma réclamation rejetée

Cookies et statistiques

Nous utilisons des cookies strictement nécessaires au fonctionnement du vérificateur et de votre réclamation. Avec votre accord, nous utilisons aussi des statistiques respectueuses de la vie privée (PostHog, serveurs européens). Nous ne vendons jamais vos données.